Toshiba DR570 Prices, Reviews, Sales, Compare

November 16th, 2009 by camren7672
Toshiba DR570

Product: Toshiba DR570

List Price: $179.99
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Click Here To See Amazon Sale Price

Add to cart to see low price@CHAADPRODUCTTILE

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on Toshiba DR570


I purchased this DVD recorder two weeks ago due to a need to replace an aging VCR that had provided many years of excellent service. Since I currently own a Toshiba DVD player and the VCR was a Toshiba,I decided to purchase the DR570, a newer version of the DR670 which was overwhelmingly positively reviewed.

The setup was extremely simple. The built in tuner has made recording easy and the picture quality is amazingly clear. I have not had any problems with the machine locking up or losing settings. I have played DVDs of both TV programs I have recorded as well as feature films. True, the remote does not feature a volume control– however, neither does my Toshiba DVD player purchased back when video rental stores switched from VHS to DVD.

My only complaint is that loading is a little slow, but all in all I am extremely delighted with my purchase.

I purchased 2 Toshiba DR570 DVD Recorder to replace by VHS. What a difference. I record on it daily because I hate watching tv with all the commercials, and I can watch the shows when I want. It is like watching a live broadcast with the bonus of fast forwarding through the commercials. At times, I have taken the disks out of the Toshiba and play them in a DVD player that is several years old. No Problems. I did set up the Toshiba to do automatic finalization of the disk when I finish recording after reading the review that some people have problems with playing back in older DVD players.

I do record on Memorex 4x DVD+RW. It says I can record on them 1,000 times. So far, no problems with re-recording on the same disk. I do have to remember to Format each time I want to tape over something - which you need to get use to after having only VHS. The Toshiba does tell you how much record time you have left. So if you have a problem when you record, I have found it is usually the “operator” or “me” setting the times.

So, Great Product. Yes, I would buy again!

I have the DR560 which is the older version of this one. I had some issues with the 560, but it worked okay and the picture quality was very good. So, I decided to get this newer version DR570. I reviewed the other recorder, so I am not going the repeat myself in this review because both recorders are almost exactly the same.

Here are my complaints with this DR570. Both remotes are the same in that you cannot see what the buttons are because of the black remote and gray lettering. The picture quality is great, that is, when I can get it to work.

I set up the recorder and the next day I noticed the time was off by over 6 hours. I tried to turn the unit on to set the clock again, but nothing happened. The recorder was locked up and would not turn on. I unplugged it for 10 minutes then plugged it back in and it worked. So, I reset the clock and then checked the channels. Then I pressed setup again to recheck the other settings and the recorder locked up again. Soooo, again I unplugged it for 10 minutes and plugged it back in and it worked. It seems that it does not hold the settings and I will have to keep unplugging it. The other recorder did the same thing, but only occasionally so it didn’t bother me. However, I don’t know just how often this new one is going to give me problems.

Obviously, I cannot recommend this recorder.

Philips 22PFL3504D/F7 Reviews, Best Prices, Compare

November 16th, 2009 by camren7672
Philips 22PFL3504D/F7

Product: Philips 22PFL3504D/F7

List Price: $329.99
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Click Here To See Amazon Sale Price

Add to cart to see low price@CHAADPRODUCTTILE

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on Philips 22PFL3504D/F7


Excellent 22″ HDTV. Nice for kitchen, bedroom, office or small rec-room. GREAT picture!!!

Includes 2 HDMI ports (1 back and 1 side), Component connections, S-Video and etc.

When you program the channels on setup it picks up both analog and digital channels.

You don’t need a set-top cable box to get a great picture just hook the cable from the wall to the TV rf in.

Hooked to an antenna the digital channels look fantastic.

The sound is what you expect from a small TV…good but not great.

The remote color including the buttons is very dark and hard to read in dim lighting but works great.

Great little TV!!!

Excellent picture quality, decent sound for its size. Auto channel programming seems a little wonky, but that may be my local cable provider’s fault. Very good television for a small area, viewed from around 6 to 8 feet away.

Panasonic TC-L37S1 Reviews, Best Prices, Compare

November 16th, 2009 by camren7672
Panasonic TC-L37S1

Product: Panasonic TC-L37S1

List Price: $849.95
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Click Here To See Amazon Sale Price

Add to cart to see low price@CHAADPRODUCTTILE

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on Panasonic TC-L37S1


I am so happy that I bought this TV because it is just outstanding. I did a lot of research on numerous TV’s and was not totally satisfied until I saw this Panasonic Viera S1. I was planning on buying a TV with 120 Hz but the S1 handled fast motion very well. To summarize, here are the pro’s and con’s.

Pro:

Horizontal viewing angle

Great standard def. compared to other LCD. Amazing high def.

Blacks comprable to Samsung unless really off angle

Clarity/sharpness

Vivid colors

Thin attractive bezel

Built quality of TV and remote

Motion Focus technology

Price

Cons:

Blacks wash out if extremely off angle vertically (probably >150 degrees)

No fine control of colors

Largest size is 37 inches

If you are in the market for a TV this size, buy this thing and you will not regret it. I feel like I stole this TV from Panasonic because I bought it for $699. It outperforms a lot of LCD’s that are $300-$500 more expensive. There is not another LCD out there in this price range that packs this much punch period!

Bought this TV based on my great experience with my Pany 58″ plasma. Not many reviews on the S1 as of yet, however, older model Pany LCD’s had good reviews. This was the 4th tv that I purchased for the family room, which included a Toshiba 40″ lcd (not Regza), a Vizio 32 lcd and a Vizio 32 plasma. The first 3 were returned and this one is a keeper.

As expected, set up was a breeze and it mounted to my articulating wall mount without a hitch. Picture settings had to be tweaked to get the proper flesh tones, but in a few minutes it looked great. Of course, I like to tinker with all of the setting in order to get familiar with the tv. Overall, picture looks great. Sound on this tv is very good. Need to adjust the settings to increase treble and base, and also to turn on the surround. Definitely fills the room with full clear sound.

The tv is in a bright room and there can be minor glare depending on the time of day and viewing angle. Putting the picture in vivid mode takes care of any glare issues. Actually, it really is not a problem (as compared with the Vizio plasma that I returned) Not that I bash Vizio because I have 3 of them and am basically very pleased with their performance.

The only disappointment was the remote. I was hoping that it would be the same as with my plasma, however, it does not have the same solid feel. For some reason, they took a nicely fitted convex backed remote and gave it two concave sections that just don’t feel right. Also, they switched the volume and channel buttons which ia pain after you get used to it being the “correct way” on the plasma remote. I must add, however, that the remote is far superior to the junk that you get with many brands of TV. Vizio used to put out a great remote, however, the later models sure dumbed it down. Can’t say much good about the Toshiba remotes either.

All in all, the Pany S1 is a keeper. My search for the right tv is finally over. Turned out that I got a great price and fantastic delivery with Amazon affiliate 6th Ave Electronics. Delivery in two days and price of $707 w/free shipping. I would highly recommend this for anyone looking for a 37″ lcd.

I spent a lot of time deliberating over whether to buy this TV. Since it costs $100-200 less than comparable TVs from Samsung, Sony, and Sharp, I thought there must be a catch. Eventually I decided to take the risk and purchased it, and I am very happy. The picture is outstanding - I have absolutely no complaints about this TV. It looks at least as good, if not better, than any other HDTV I’ve seen. I would recommend it to anyone.

Coby TFDVD2274 Best Prices, Compare, Reviews

November 15th, 2009 by camren7672
Coby TFDVD2274

Product: Coby TFDVD2274

List Price: $299.99
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Click Here To See Amazon Sale Price

Add to cart to see low price@CHAADPRODUCTTILE

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on Coby TFDVD2274


We purchased this set to replace a Sanyo 15″ flat screen. The Sanyo worked well but we needed to increase screen size as eyesight diminshes with age. As said before the remote is quite poor and takes forever to react. The picture is of lesser quality than the Sanyo.

It will work out ok for $229 freight paid but I should have read more reviews instead being impulsive to buy.

Great picture and sound(better with added speakers) perfect for small apartment, kids room, den or large kitchen. Makes a perfect second monitor for a PC. The remote is fair could of been better made and more functional.

Very solid little TV. I bought it for my sons room and I’m really pleasantly surprised. The tv construction is solid and the performance is respectable. The remote is a little plasticy but has taken some abuse and is still working fine and looking as good as it ever did. (The last might not be a compliment.)

Here is some technical info I manged to dig up after a painfully long search. Hopefully it will help someone else if I leave it here.

TFDVD2274 usb/sd functions:

MP3 Supported Sampling Frequency: 8/11.025/12/16/22.05/24/32/44.1/48 KHz (MPEG1/2/2.5 Layer 1/2/3 ISO/IEC111723,ISO/IEC13818-3.2)

WMA Supported Sampling Frequency: The same as MP3, WMA8/WMA9 Nonsupport WMA9 lossless,WMA9 Voice,WMA9 Professional or DRM

Supported Bit-rates: Can support 5~320 kbits/s for constant bit rate. up to 384 kbps for variable bit

JPEG

MPEG1/2/4

USB can support 3.5Mbps;

SD Card can support 6Mbps;

Audiovox D-1917PK Best Prices, Sales, Reviews, Compare

November 15th, 2009 by camren7672
Audiovox D-1917PK

Product: Audiovox D-1917PK

List Price: No List Price Available
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Click Here To See Amazon Sale Price

Add to cart to see low price@CHAADPRODUCTTILE

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on Audiovox D-1917PK


i am very happy with this product. the design and the features are wonderful. my kids can use it anywhere. it comes with car charger, home charger and battery pack. it comes with usb port, sd port and av inputs. it also comes with 2 earphones. i havent had any issues playing any type of cd/dvd. Very good features, very convenient, helps on the long drives keeping my kids occupied.

Out of all the laptops and personal video players I had, used, or borrowed, this has had the best sound quality. Children don’t keep complaining that they missed something - and they need neither headphones nor audio boosters! Highly recommend.

We bought this for our son to use on long drives. We were concerned about whether or not the audio would be loud enough because he can’t keep headphones on well yet. It turns out the volume is plenty loud. The picture is nothing spectacular (not super crisp), but it is bright and just fine for young viewers and those of us who aren’t picky. It’s easy to use.

Logitech WiLife Digital Video Security–Hidden Master System Camera Opinion

November 13th, 2009 by camren7672
Logitech WiLife Digital Video Security--Hidden Master System Camera

Product: Logitech WiLife Digital Video Security–Hidden Master System Camera

List Price: $329.99
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Add to cart to see low price@CHAADPRODUCTTILE

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on Logitech WiLife Digital Video Security–Hidden Master System Camera


There are three sets that are nearly identical, and differ only in the type of camera: this one (hidden camera), the outdoor starter kit, and the indoor starter kid. for more comprehensive reviews, gaze at those other kits as well.

As for my understanding, this state does what it says it does in a lovely seamless fashion: you install the software, hobble the camera into the wall, trail a USB adapter into the wall and your computer, build some minor configuration changes and you are all residence. I have no doubt we could have gotten a better system cheaper but not one as seamlessly integrated.

We looked at many different systems and bought this one instead because:

- most witness cams broadcast for TV…you then need a TV/VCR to recount, or a separately purchased adapter to acquire it work with your computer, and we weren’t technically confident enough to want to steal different pieces and figure out how to net them working together

- some eye cams are self-recording (they possess memory internally) but these tend to be pricey AND they limit how distinguished you can record; they will hold up if you don’t determined them out regularly, and for our purposes that wasn’t practical

- most “wireless” eye cams work on a WiFi wireless network, which is grand if you have one, but we wanted this for spend in a site we didn’t have wifi; this one works by transmitting over your home or office electrical system.

- the cost of the system includes a website you can position up to plan your camera remotely (although if you have a firewall you’ll only be able to discover 3 diminutive pieces; if the system can connect directly, which might require configuring your router which some people will acquire daunting, you can peer constantly) .

So, that said, here are some cons:

- only works on PCs, not macs

- 95% of the configuration is a fraction of cake, but some aspects are confusing, like how to schedule alerts, and setting up for emailing alerts

- the program has many features that are in the program but you can’t click on them — they are there as advertisements for a “platinum” version of the software that costs $80 a year. It’s annoying to have a cover tubby of buttons you aren’t able to click, and to have advertising be such a prevalent fraction of the interface

- this one is kind of petty, but it would be nice of the clock that hides the camera had an scare, since we had to capture a “right” clock in residence of this one

- the camera is pretty for security, but the image is kind of outlandish - it appears to be infrared? Which means the colors are bizarre. Reds turn yellow, greens and blues turn white. Which is probably ravishing for security purposes, but don’t be expecting to bag a high quality video out of it

Logitech makes some chilly things and the Logitech WiLife Digital Video Security Hidden Master System Camera is one of those very cold things.

According to the documentation and marketing, it takes only 15 minutes to region one of these up. That’s not exactly lawful however–if you count how long it took to unpack the system, place up the software then the hardware in a noble state, be prepared to expend at least an hour.

That said, the entire process is simple and should not reveal great concern beyond thinking about where to position and focus the camera. The package I got came with a camera, two transmitter/receivers: one connects via USB to the computer and the other via Ethernet to the camera, a CD of drivers and software and an assortment of bits of hardware chiefly for mounting the camera.

Installation of the software was straightforward and easy. Setting up the hardware was also straightforward; the included Speedy Initiate guides and other pieces of documentation was distinct and easy to follow, complete with color illustrations. I was soon up and functional. The unpleasant news soon followed.

I have a wish list for Logitech: Would that there was a diagram for the camera to be completely wireless. Even with the 8-feet-long Ethernet cable, the camera requires a power outlet and is thus slight to being within 8-feet or so of said outlet. The best set I could believe of putting a camera (the package came with only one; more can be obtained for an average cost of $200) was approach the top of my living room which, of course, doesn’t have any outlets close-by. With several different ways of mounting (on the wall using an included apparatus with wall screws and such, on a pane of glass with suckers, or on a desk with a stand), I guess there are several options, but it seems there was none I was jubilant with.

The other thing I wish for is that the features that a prospective user would gain most useful (such as remotely controlling pan and zoom; setting an automatic schedule for recording, etc.) are only available by subscribing to an $80 a year subscription to something called WiLife Platinum. All of these `non-features’ contribute to my thinking of this product simply as `neat’ but not very practical. I guess if I really needed such a camera system, perhaps I’d spring for it, but it is a downside.

The camera itself, without the Premium subscription, requires a manual focusing. Which is impartial colossal because two people are required for such a procedure: one looking at the WiLife whisper console and shouting to the person who most likely is precariously perched on a rickety ladder tweaking the lens. I can reveal you that the portray quality is heavenly top-notch and the ability to recount several levels of quality is also quite nice. I could, for example, determine to report at 15 frames per second or less; I could describe at VGA or QVGA (640×480 with VGA or 320×240 for QVGA) ; I could elaborate `zones’ which means I could focus recording only on a specific, defined space. It is also possible to have the system contact the user via email and mobile (PDA, etc.) alerts.

To top it off, all of this is viewable online using the WiLife location. However, as I stated earlier, in order to come by the more juicy (and, in my belief, more practical) features, the user will need to subscribe to WiLife Platinum. The maddening thing about it is that WiLife thunder console is filled with references to Platinum-only features. The front of the WiLife announce console has a `zoom and pan’ feature that figuratively screams “capture Platinum, dude!” every time the program opens up, which is on logon if you determine the default settings.

There are definitely some very frosty uses for such a package but for the “average” user, I don’t eye this product fitting the bill unless as one of those “frosty” things to have although it could smooth have some very useful security applications.

4 stars out of 5.

Canon PowerShot SX200IS 12 MP Digital Camera with 12x Wide Angle Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 3.0-inch LCD (Black) Sale

November 9th, 2009 by camren7672
Canon PowerShot SX200IS 12 MP Digital Camera with 12x Wide Angle Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 3.0-inch LCD (Black)

Product: Canon PowerShot SX200IS 12 MP Digital Camera with 12x Wide Angle Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 3.0-inch LCD (Black)

List Price: No List Price Available
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Add to cart to see low price@CHAADPRODUCTTILE

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on Canon PowerShot SX200IS 12 MP Digital Camera with 12x Wide Angle Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 3.0-inch LCD (Black)


This review is based off of several days of use and a THOROUGH review of the manual. If you are interested in seeing specifications and actual pictures of this camera (which I suggest you do) I recommend visiting websites that offer extensive these types of reviews [...]First, lets review what seems to be common CONS to the camera.

POP UP FLASH. Contrary to some reviews, this camera is not hard to handle/hold nor does the pop up flash get in the way or feel flimsy. Notice Canon has made three designs to combat this problem (e.g. indented thumbprint above controls on back of camera, curved body on right side of camera, and about 3/4 inch space to place finger behind the flash. As I right this review, I am playing around with the flash and notice it feels sturdy; not flimsy. Also, the further the distance between the flash and the lens allows for a better red-eye reduction.

NO VIDEO (optical) Zoom. This camera offers excellent video quality for a “point and shoot camera”. It is 720 so expect that quality - no more no less. As for the zoom, it only has a digital zoom (i.e. less quality than optical). Nonetheless, it should not be a deal breaker - unless you are in the market for a digital videorecorder. I recommend a stand alone video recorder at this point. Would it be nice to have a zoom, sure, but honestly, this is not a big deal.

NOISE - Indoor use. PLEASE believe me when I say I find very little if any noise on indoor shots (when using the camera correctly (e.g reading the manual!!!). There are many ways to adjust this camera - MANY ways! Again, I am reviewing pictures I just shot today inside my local library and find them very pleasing and no noise!

FIT/FEEL of Camera. This camera does not feel flimsy. This I think I can promise you. Actually, when I got the camera in my hands, I was suprised to feel and see it was thicker than I thought - but not too thick. Still able to put in pocket (although not if you are wearing tight jeans). If you are looking at this camera, chances are you doing so because of the aesthetic body - and you are right. When/if you put it in your hands, you’ll understand that it is, well, sexy and fashionable.

I have put forth what I saw as potentially “deal breakers” to some people and find all of these supposedly negative points not so negative. After thorough research and an extensive review of the manual, I find this camera to be excellent.

Finally, let me try to state what I believe to be the absolute best features of this camera.

1. Quality. The only way to defend this point is to recommend doing research. Many websites have posted pictures this camera has taken - many of them stunning. I even saw a side by side comparison with the SX200IS rival - the TZ7. It was a picture of a night time view of a major city. This camera won hands down. And as for video quality, I was happy with the quality - if you expect 720 and not blu-ray quality. It honestly is great- oh yea, and I notice that when shooting with video, the image seemed to have little or no shake ( I was suprised about this).

2. Function. You can immediately use this even if you never used a camera before. Thank canon for the “easy” function which lets you only hit the shutter button: it does ALL the work for you, and has hints/tips on the screen as you shoot. Or if you are not so novice, you can turn this camera into a complete manual function and create your own aperture, shutter, and ISO values. (This is the reason I bought this camera; so I could go more manual while my wife could just point and click).

3. After having this camera, I have noticed that CANON has not marketed this camera well enough. It has LCD image brightness control that changes on screen depending on how bright it is where you are shooting. Very nice to view the lcd. Also, the LCD has been layered with a scratch resistant coating!

Finally, in my opinion, this camera’s best feature is its versatility. What I mean by this is that it takes excellent pictures and allows you to grow with the camera - this point needs to be emphasized.

I suggest that you truly do your research (as you are doing!!:) and you may see as I did that no matter how many cameras I reviewed, I kept coming back to the SX200IS. I am glad I have it.

One final point. If you do get this, please review the manual. It is your bible and will really help you understand the camera if you want to turn it into more than a point and shoot. I wrote this review because I was SHOCKED at the criticisms this camera received. I agree that this camera can be fine tuned (longer battery life…..etc…) but these are by no means deal breakers. Don’t worry, whatever camera you get, it will be soon outdated - all cameras get their annual tweaking. Having said that about camera’s getting outdated, note that I chose this camera for the features it has for the price it is. Having taken it home, I realize that I am more than getting my money’s worth. I am honestly concerned about answering any questions you may have. I wish I could ask people questions before I buy things, so please feel free to comment and/or ask. Best wishes.

***Updated 4-6-08****

For those interested in comparisons, I have recently compared the SX200IS vs the Panasonic TZ5 [...]. Unbelievable, I was able to find same scene shots taken by these two different cameras. This is hard to find. Plus, being that the TZ5 is really the main competitor to the SX200IS, it makes for an interesting comparison. If you do review this website, particularly notice the “city night shot” and ISO 400 setting. In my opinion, the SX200IS is much clearer and offers a more accurate picture. Again, the SX200IS is a winner to me!

***Updatd 7-26-09***

After 4 months of extensive use, this camera is now having power issues. When the camera is turned on, and then turned off, it automatically turns on when I do not want it too! :( It will go back to be fixed. So in terms of reliability, I am a little disappointed. Nonetheless, given the quality and features of this camera, I will GLADLY keep the camera and GLADLY have it fixed. Even with this electronic issue, it is still the best camera out there.

I received this before a weekend trip and it turned out to be a very well rounded camera. It’s not as small as an Elph but it’s still just small and light enough to carry around in your pocket or purse for easy access. The 12x zoom lens is terrific and in well lighted situations even the digital zoom creates clear, sharp pictures. The offset is that you lose the f2.8 aperture of other 3x camera’s.

I tried most of the scene settings and they all produce slightly different results. The AUTO setting uses a higher shutter speed and ISO setting than Portrait. In Program mode you can set the ISO setting to 80 or 100 and have the camera adjust the shutter speed. The foliage setting does enhance the greens. If you have enough light the indoor setting works better and uses a faster shutter speed while Night snapshot uses a slower shutter speed and produces a better overall shot in lower light. In all but the low light scenes the camera does tend to over expose the shot slightly so I ended up using the exposure adjustment at - 1/3 or -2/3’s to compensate.

I really liked the ability to adjust the settings to get a well exposed picture out of a range of situations that you can’t always get with an Elph and the zoom lens allows you to frame a shot from just about any distance. The pictures are clear, bright and on par with other Canon camera’s in it’s class. There’s plenty of features to play with like face detect and blink detect and the Image Stabilization works very well.

If you are ready to step up from a point and shoot camera to one that provides more control, has a better zoom but is still pocketable the SX200 IS is well worth putting on your list to check out.

Sony 2 GB Memory Stick PRO Duo Flash Memory Card MSMT2G Sale

November 9th, 2009 by camren7672
Sony 2 GB Memory Stick PRO Duo Flash Memory Card MSMT2G

Product: Sony 2 GB Memory Stick PRO Duo Flash Memory Card MSMT2G

List Price: $29.99
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Add to cart to see low price@CHAADPRODUCTTILE

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on Sony 2 GB Memory Stick PRO Duo Flash Memory Card MSMT2G

Even though I have been slowly weaning myself off of the newer Sony cameras, I still have some Sony devices that need memory pro duo cards. There are some advantages and a few disadvantages, namely the cost and availability. Sony’s memory format averages 30 to 100 percent higher prices for the same capacity of SDHC cards. While that sucks, if you have a Sony Camera or a PSP there’s not much you can do about it.

To that point, both the new Sony Cybershot DSCT300 Digital Camera and upcoming PSP God of War Entertainment Pack will benefit from any of these memory cards. Both of those devices, along with most Sony devices for that matter are only comaptible with the memory duo platform.

But like I said, if you need one of these cards, there are some advantages especially if you get a Mark II card. Namely, the performance speed of the mark II format is about 50% higher than the fastest available SDHC card at the moment. The rating is for 36 MB/s and what I’ve seen through some basic tests seems to indicate real performance close to this. In fact, the solid performance has to be the biggest pro for these cards. So while it sucks to have little choice, when you factor in the premium performance it’s easier to swallow.

The 2 and 4 GB cards are a better value than larger capacity ones right now. Sometimes you want the largest card you can get, but till the 8 and 16 GB cards come down I see no reason to buy them. Not to mention, this isn’t for my primary camera but for an older one that I use as a backup.

Make sure your device is compatible with the card. Some older electronics aren’t compatible with larger capacities, although in general Sony has been better with making these guys backward compatible than others.

It’s always a good idea to have several extra cards on hand just in case. This 4 GB card is a nice performer. If you have a high capacity camera (10 Megapixels or more) and are storing videos or RAW images, the extra cash for the 8GB card may be worth it if the price is right. Or you may want to step up to the larger 16 GB size that is now available. But if you wait a little longer you can save yourself some cash. I have to take off at least 1 star for value, but in terms of performance I couldn’t be happier.

Enjoy!

This 16GB Memory Stick Duo II card works great with the PSP portable gaming system. It comes pre-formatted, so all you have to do is stick it into your PSP and go. In fact, there is a picture of the PSP right on the packaging.

The usable space on this device is actually 14.9 GB, however.

The “Mark2″ certification on the card has to do with higher writing speed requirements and indicates the memory is certified to operate with AVCHD recording products.

Viper 488V Led 2-Way Remote Opinion

November 8th, 2009 by camren7672
Viper 488V Led 2-Way Remote

Product: Viper 488V Led 2-Way Remote

List Price: $169.99
Average customer review:

Amazon Price: Too low to display
Add to cart to see low price@CHAADPRODUCTTILE

Availability: In Stock
Usually ships in 24 Hours
Free Shipping Available

Compare Prices on Viper 488V Led 2-Way Remote


The 2-way feature is great on this remote. But just because you’re paying 50-100 for this remote, don’t expect it to be high-quality. I’ve owned two in the past, and each one has broken the same way. The first problem- Solder joints. After a couple of months, the solder joints (on both) would break, especially around the battery terminals. Easy fix- Simply resolder the joints. Next, the cosmetic paint and light labels will rub off, and thats when things start to go downhill. If you keep it in your pocket like other car remotes, the plastic case will start to break- Notably at the top right corner. Once that happens, the remote looks awful, and the keyring will fall out because the tabs holding the two halves together have weakened too.

On top of all that, the second remote I have sometimes beeps, and sometimes doesn’t.

If you want the two-way feature, you can get this. But if you want a solid remote, consider buying the compatible 1-way version, P/N 7141V or 7141 P (python and viper remotes are interchangeable). It will not give you audible feedback, but it will save you frustration. They are compatible with the LED 2-way systems, too.

I sure hope DEI’s new systems use better remotes. Its a mystery to me as to why Viper Alarm systems are as popular as they are- nothing but plastic junk in my opinion.

UPDATE:

I picked up a less expensive one-way Viper remote that is compatible with my system (I was tired of throwing down so much $$ for a piece of crap). It is about two months old, and is starting to crack as well.

I have a Python alarm system in my Honda Del Sol. That was Circuit City’s version of the Viper alarm. Most remotes will fall apart after only a few years of use, and mine was no exception. Just got this programmed to my system yesterday, and it works like new. Hopefully, this will last longer than the last one did, but these things don’t have the best track record for longevity.

Watch X-Men Origins: Wolverine Movie

November 7th, 2009 by camren7672

Wolverine Movie

Wolverine Movie

Download & Watch X-Men Origins: Wolverine at Amazon.com.

Click Here Now to Download & Watch X-Men Origins: Wolverine Online Now!

I want to get this out first, I love the comics. I think none of these movies are anywhere close to represent the X-men as they are in the comics. That said, I think these movies exist in a different world that has nothing to do with the 616, except for the characters names and most their powers. I have no problems with these movies; X-men 1 and 2 were very entertaining action movies. But even those movies should have been called, “Wolverine ‘N Pals”, because they didn’t focus on the X-men, but on Wolverine’s interaction with the other characters. My expectations of this movie were not based on the comics themselves, but on the previous movie storylines. I knew in my heart that Hollywood would somehow find a way to rape the image of one of my favorite characters in the Marvel Universe, Deadpool. So when “Weapool 11″ popped up at the end I wasn’t even surprised they would do something that silly. I read an interview a long time ago that about X-men 1 that the producers had to fight to have Cyclops wear the visor because the director didn’t like it. So, I am not surprised nor bothered by the fact that these Hollywood interpretations don’t have a clue about how these characters should be handled. I did like the previous movies (except 3), and understand that this is merely a diferent interpretation of these characters.

Wolverine Origins or, “Wolverine ‘N Pals 4; how this mess began”, is a very entertaining movie. But it fails to deliver a comprehensible story line. A lot of the story doesn’t make any sense. The movie,( as you might be have been clued to know), is about Wolverines origins, its shows you where he came from and how his powers manifested, leading to spending a long part of his life with his half brother Sabertooth, whom we were introduced to in the 1st X-men. After many adventures and wars, the pair ends up joining a military group of people with superpowers led by Stryker. On one of the missions, Wolverine angered by Sabertooth’s actions leaves the group to pursue a nicer lifestyle. This is when he falls in love with Silverfox and the pair lives happily for a while. Many years later Sabertooth comes back in a killing rampage taking out some old members of Stryker’s group, and Wolverine’s love is killed during this. To get his revenge, Wolverine agrees to have done on him an experimental procedure that with give him metal plated bones.

Not bad right? Love, family, betrayal and revenge. All the stuff to make a great story. This is where it doesn’t add up. For those of you that don’t want “Spoilers” please don’t read, as I might give away some plot details.

-After wolverine finds Silverfox dead, Wolverine a veteran of many wars, doesn’t check to make sure she is in fact dead? Why did he leave her body there in the field? Couldnt’t his enhanced smell detect the fake blood? Was it her manipulation power that convinced him to just move on instead of taking her to a medic.

-If she can manipulate people by touch, how the hell didn’t she manipulate Stryker in letting her sister or any of the other kids go? She spends 7 years of her life with Wolvie and doesn’t manipulate him, and indestructible man, to kill Stryker? Was she having to much fun maybe?

-After Wolverine has adamantium put on his bones and escapes to visit the “Kents”, why on earth would Stryker send Maverick with a rifle to shoot a man that can’t die with metal bones? Was he going to shoot through an eyeball from a helicopter? He missed pretty badly by the way, twice. Superman gonna be angry when he goes home to visit.

-Its revealed that Silverfox wasn’t killed by Sabertooth yet after Sabertooth saves Wolverine from falling off the cooling tower, Wolverine tells him “this doesn’t change anything”. Why? She’s not dead. She fooled you. He saves you from falling and having your butt kicked but Weapon 11, why the hell are you still mad at him?

-Stryker failed to wipe Wolverine’s memories so the solution is to shoot a guy with metal on his skull on his head? How the hell does that work? How did he know it would work?

-Why did the most powerful telepath (Professor X) not control someone inside the 3 mile island release the kids? Why wait 7 years and then help. Why didn’t he do that stop time thing from the previous movies so he can save the kids? Where was Magneto? Doesnt he care about abused mutant kids? (One of the restrained kids looked like Quicksilver, who is Magnetos son in the comics)

-How come those kids couldn’t get away on their own? What was that chain link fence cage they were in made of? Adamantium?

-Why was Gambit hanging out in a casino, when he knew he was being looked for by Stryker? How was it that Stryker can’t find him in a long time and yet Wolverine finds him in a day? Maybe Stryker didn’t want him anymore. Maybe they couldn’t persuade the Blob to talk?

-Why add the scene in the end where Stryker is going to be arrested for his crimes, when we well know that he was a high ranking military official in X-men 2?

Well these are most of the plot points from the movie that just don’t make any sense. It’s ok for an action movie to be extremely silly and self referential in that way. For example in Transformers when they have the teen kid take the cube and the alien so they can hide in the populated city, one of the characters mentions how dumb that idea is. They make no excuses in this movie, and just because it’s “supposed” to be a dumb action movie, there is no justification for the producers of this movie to assume their viewers are idiots, and won’t care about a story plot that doesn’t make any sense. Which, apparently they are correct because this movie made a boatload of cash. I will not act like there is nothing wrong with this movie just because it’s flashy and has lost of explosions.

In my arrogant opinion, it’s a onetime watcher. This is not a boring movie by far, yes, it’s a lot of fun and tons of action and the movie’s cast was really great. But the story is convoluted and nonsensical, it seems to take the audience for granted. So, if you want to enjoy this mess, just ignore the entire story and watch the shiny stuff happening on screen.

Awesome movie, does most of wolverine’s history justice, only part that kinda stunk was…SPOILERS AHEAD!!!!!….what they did with deadpool/ryan reynolds character, he could have been so much more in the movie, but it was a very enjoyable movie, watched it twice allready!!! blue ray is awesome!!!

Over the course of the “X-Men” trilogy there has been one constant story thread that has been touched upon, yet it’s never been fully explored. For those of you that have watched the series, then you most likely know exactly what I’m referring to… the origin of the most popular mutant of all, Logan/Wolverine. Finally, after three highly successful films chronicling the adventures of the X-Men team, 20th Century Fox has chosen to spin-off Wolverine into his own movie and potential franchise by providing his official origin story with “X-Men Origins: Wolverine”.

“X-Men Origins: Wolverine” presents many key events in Wolverine’s (Hugh Jackman) life prior to his fateful arrival at the X-Mansion in the original “X-Men” film. Beginning with his initial discovery as a youth that he possessed the ability to unsheathe claws from beneath his skin, to his complicated friendship and eventual hatred of his former best friend Victor Creed (Liev Schreiber), his time spent working for the government as part of an elite team of mutant trackers, and all of this culminating in a senses-shattering showdown that will leave no one unscathed.

The mystery behind Wolverine’s origin has been a long-standing plotline, not just in the film trilogy, but in the various comic books in which the character has appeared. In 2001, Marvel Comics began a six-issue limited series aptly titled “Origin” that would establish the official backstory for the berserker mutant once and for all. Obviously, so long as interest in the onscreen version of the character remained alive, it would only be a matter of time before his origin, or at least some semblance of it, made it to the big screen as well.

Many times with spin-offs, the story tends to be weaker than those utilized for the main franchise; however, this film appears to be one of those very rare exceptions where the quality actually remains intact. Written by David Benioff (”Troy”) and Skip Woods (”Swordfish”), with some elements loosely based upon the mini-series “Origin”, the story focuses upon some of the various influences, circumstances, and powerful outside forces that shaped Logan into becoming one of the most dangerous mutants on the face of the Earth.

The story spends ample time showcasing the extremely visceral nature of the film’s two primary characters, Wolverine and Sabretooth, and how they deal with their inner beasts in drastically different ways. Along with this complicated relationship, the film delves into the almost constant, yet subtle, manipulation that eventually led to Logan’s decision to participate in the excruciatingly painful Weapon X program, which bonded liquid Adamantium to his bones. It’s during these moments of manipulation, mostly at the hands of William Stryker (Danny Huston), that the film’s story really shines.

Another strong aspect of the film is the sharply written, and often times witty, dialogue. The interactions between the characters felt believable and completely natural within the scenes. Some spin-offs suffer from an over-abundance of clichés or merely recycled lines and moments from the original franchise on which they are based; however, “Wolverine” easily side-steps these issues in every respect. In the hands of less capable writers that didn’t feel some responsibility to keep the quality of the franchise intact, the dialogue, and the rest of the story for that matter, could have potentially gone the way of so many other spin-offs and failed miserably, thus hurting the main franchise in the process. As a fan of the series, I am very pleased by the fact that even though this is the fourth film in the franchise, the creative minds behind the series continually try to surpass what has come before.

For all you action fans out there do not worry. This series hasn’t lost sight of one of its key elements. Throughout the film’s story the action scenes never take a backseat to the drama unfolding within the characters’ lives. The fights are much more violent and at times graphic in comparison to the previous three films of the “X-Men” franchise; not to mention, even more up close and personal due to fewer mutants with projectile-like abilities. The decision to make the fights even more brutal worked very well alongside the animalistic overtones of the story; although it may have resulted in some parents not wishing their children to see the film, despite the fact that they may have seen the other three in the series.

Of course, what would a comic book movie be without the use of visual effects? Well, obviously it would be quite boring, but that almost goes without saying. For the most part, the CGI-intensive sequences were well executed; however, there were some surprising scenes in which the effects looked a bit shoddy. Oddly, enough these scenes involved the use of Wolverine’s claws, which by this point should have been mastered and no longer a cause for concern. I’m not sure what caused the problem, if it was a lack of texture on the CGI claws or what, but something was definitely off about them during a couple of scenes. Please note, that these are not pivotal scenes and that the problem was not all that detrimental to the end result of the movie, it’s just something that I found frustrating and thought honestly shouldn’t have occurred within the film. Otherwise, like I said, the visual effects were very good, and at times numerous sequences were truly awesome to watch and easily overshadowed any of the weaker moments in this area.

Lastly, the acting for the film, just as it was in the original three movies, remains consistently high throughout. Despite having played the role of Wolverine three times already, Hugh Jackman is still able to bring a fresh new approach to the character that is crucial to the continued success of the series. No doubt the ability for Jackman to convey such enthusiasm for the role was assisted by the fact that he was so passionate about finally getting to tell the official origin for this beloved comic book icon. Another neat aspect of the character that was explored a little further in this film than in the previous movies was Wolverine’s famed “Berserker Rage” (comic book fans know what I’m talking about). Although, we don’t necessarily get to see an all-out fully realized rage, we are given a much closer look at what he would be like if he succumbed to his unbridled fury, and it was obvious that Hugh enjoyed this new side to the character being explored.

Supporting Hugh are some extremely talented actors beginning with Liev Schreiber (”The Sum of All Fears”). Liev takes a role that was relatively wordless in the original film, and was tasked with creating a character that was dramatically rich, incredibly feral, and ultimately could become the nemesis to Wolverine we saw in the first movie. Not necessarily an easy job, but Liev pulled it off perfectly. He delivered a multi-layered villain that was a prime example of what Wolverine could have become if given a couple of different choices along the way, and Liev is clearly relishing every evil moment he gets onscreen. Next is actor Danny Huston (”30 Days of Night”) taking over the role of William Stryker from Brian Cox (”X2: X-Men United”). Danny played Stryker with the perfect blend of subtle manipulation and malice. At times he would be fatherly, especially towards Logan (albeit only to further his own agenda), but then he would snap and show his true colors by unveiling an obviously twisted, sadistic, and potentially unstable man who wanted nothing more than unlimited power to quell the surging mutant problem.

Rounding out the supporting cast is actor Ryan Reynolds (”The Proposal”) and singer turned actor Will.i.am (”Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa”). I’ve become a fan of Ryan’s work over the last few years, and I enjoy his unfettered sarcasm that he seems to imbue into almost every single character he portrays, but never in a way that feels unnatural or tired within in the role, mind you. In this film, Ryan isn’t given all that much screen time, but what he does get he definitely makes the most of by making his character of Wade Wilson (comic book fans know him as the Merc with the Mouth, Deadpool) an enjoyable addition to the group of rogues that Stryker has assembled. Sadly, his role was intended as an introduction to the character in hopes of getting an eventual spin-off for him as well, a tactic that most likely worked given the film’s success; however, I for one wish there could have been a little more of the character in this story, not to mention fewer major tweaks to the character’s origin that don’t line-up with the comic books. But, I digress. Last, but not least, is Will.i.am as John Wraith, a mutant teleporter. Will shows that he definitely has potential, displaying some good comedic timing in a few scenes, and a natural charisma that makes for a more interesting character than I believe he would have been if played by another actor.

Directed by Gavin Hood (”Rendition”), “X-Men Origins: Wolverine” is an incredibly fast-paced action film that delivers on all counts. Granted there are some gripes with the movie, but overall it’s a very solid addition to a terrific franchise. This is a must-see for fans of the original trilogy and a perfect jumping on point for newcomers to the series.

“X-Men Origins: Wolverine” is rated PG-13 for violence, language, and brief nudity.